LETITIAS BLOG
CURRENT SHEEP ISSUES - 2024
IMPORTANT FORMS for Doctors, Healthcare Workers and Parents -- from Children's Health Defense
Attached are two different forms, two forms in English and two forms in Spanish.
One form reminds doctors, nurses and clinic workers of their ethical and legal duties to obtain informed consent before providing any medicl treatment, including vaccines.
To help stop the deaths and injuries being caused by the experimental mRNA vaccines (as well as problems caused by other vaccines and medications), please give copies of these forms to your local doctors, nurses, workers at clinics and pharmacies, teachers and any one else who needs to understand that it can no longer be business as usual with each and every vaccine treated as always "safe and effective" for everyone, regardless of each person's unique make-up.
Think about it: if people really were so fungible, then why does each person have unique fingerprints and DNA?
Please print out a supply of these and start handing them out - the people you reach may save several other people from a vaccine injury or death. Too shy to hand them out? Post them on side and rear car windows using clear contact paper (legal as long as you have two side mirrors).
Many thanks to Beverly Lubis Rai, CHD Ambassador for San Diego County for forwarding these forms to share.
And on a related note: Steve Kirsch's research indicates that a person's risk of vaccine injury increases about 20% with each injection/booster -- so stop playing Russian Roulette.
Letitia




Susan B. Anthony — On Women's Right to Vote
After being arrested for illegally voting during the American election of 1872, Susan B. Anthony delivered a speech in which she crafted rhetoric to deduce why she had committed no crime.
Anthony’s impact on women’s rights and equality in America is undeniable, and this speech displays her mastery of the rhetorical craft.
“Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.
"The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:
" 'We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.'
"It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people - women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government - the ballot.
"For any state to make sex a qualification that must ever result in the disfranchisement of one entire half of the people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post facto law, and is therefore a violation of the supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of liberty are forever withheld from women and their female posterity.
"To them this government has no just powers derived from the consent of the governed. To them this government is not a democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household - which ordains all men sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion into every home of the nation.
"Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.
"The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities. Hence, every discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the several states is today null and void, precisely as is every one against Negroes.”
— Susan B. Anthony - On Women's Right to Vote
Still Believe that JFK Jr. Will Save You and Your Kids from Lock-Downs and Mandated Injections If You Elect Him President
Tom Woods Show: Ep. 2387 Dave Smith on Trump, Humor, and The Simpsons
The University of Oregon Vaccine Mandates Are Unlawful; Please See Attached Letter for Applicable Law (PDF BELOW)
Aug. 13 2023. Conspiracy Analyst Sunday: Hawaii Fires...Like East Palestine, OH, and Covid-19, and Food Plant Fires, and Kanadian Fires, and Geoengineering...are Terrorism to usher in the New World Order LINK: https://sagehana.substack.com/p/conspiracy-analyst-sunday-hawaii |
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsalabs.org/ask-state-legislators-to-ban-covid-vaccine-mandates-r
The handy form in the article linked above from Children's Health Defense will quickly put you in touch with your alleged "representatives.'
The canned message body -- which many people will send, says this:
"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officially added the COVID-19 vaccinations to its recommended child and adolescent immunization schedules on Feb. 9. This decision may deny children the right to attend school if mandated in states without exemption laws.
There is no COVID emergency for children. Children under 18 with no comorbidities have virtually no risk of death. They have a 99.9997% recovery rate and the vast majority of children have minimal symptoms.
It is alarming that children are now subject to these “recommendations” despite serious safety concerns including myocarditis, heart attacks, blood clots, seizures and even sudden death in children.
Defend your constituents' right to choose or forgo COVID vaccinations for school attendance. Introduce legislation to ban COVID vaccine mandates for daycare and students as 21 states have already done."
Please consider deleting that message and add this one instead:
It is a violation of international law and our Constitution for anyone -- including ANY state legislator, including YOU -- to adopt a law that requires anyone to participate in a human medical experiment.
ALL vaccines, old or new, as well as all medicines and treatments, not just the experimental mRNA vaccines, or other experimental treatments, are a human medical experiment for each person, as expressed by the formula, "N = 1," meaning an experiment with just one subject.
If you ever vote to pass a law requiring children to be vaccinated in order to get their California Constitutional right to a free public education, you will have committed a serious crime and can be held liable for both statutory and compensatory damages.
This is so because, in 1992, Congress ratified the previously signed International Treaty on Civil and Political Rights ("the ICCPR"). The Nuremberg Code is Article 7 of the ICCPR, and makes it unlawful for anyone to pressure anyone, in any way, to take part in a human medical experiment.
Under the U.S. Constitution, that ratification made the ICCPR "the supreme law of the land," applicable to every state, every political subdivision, and to the federal government, its subdivisions, and its President. Thus, the ICCPR (and the Nuremberg Code which it contains) also apply to anyone who EVER took an oath to support the American Constitution, which means that these laws apply to the military, lawyers, judges, and to many others. To take office as a legislator, you, too, took that oath. Passing any law contrary to the Constitution and the ICCPR weakens rather than supports those controlling laws.
Better yet, copy this into snail mail letters and send it to all your representatives.
Katherine Watt
Tennessee House Bill 726 - Restoring State Sovereignty Through Nullification Act
Nullification is a concept that was designed to let the People protect themselves from tyranny without armed rebellion. In California, because of medical marijuana patients being unlawfully treated as criminals, we've already resorted to "jury nullification," a concept enshrined in the Constitutions of several states, e.g., Maryland. However, in California, if you mention you know about it, plan on being kicked (improperly) off the jury! State Constitution Language on Jury Nullification In fact, the right to judge the law as well as the defendant is a right that was reserved to the People by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, no matter what the State (through its representative in the courtroom, the judge, says:" State Constitution Language on Jury Nullification Far from being an unintended side-effect or bug in our constitutional system, jury nullification is explicitly a..."
So our Constitution, an amazing piece of work, actually allows the People to nullify actions by the people who are running the central government, the federal government. So, it's time to stop watching television and start digging into how to save our country from the traitors -- at all levels, both state and federal -- who are busily running it into the ground.
Letitia.
Here are some statistics about crime in California.
Crime Trends in California:
While violent crime in California remains far below its peak in the 1990s, rates are beginning to inch up—and gu...
When you see what crimes are problems, ask yourself -- how does this new technology have ANYTHING to do with preventing crime?
The big question to ask is this: how does this new technology -- that would allow the government to keep tabs on EVERYONE -- improve your life? It won't -- just the opposite.
Historically, the more intrusive government becomes, the worse it it becomes for the average, law-abiding citizens.
Intrusive governments (Hitler always comes to mind) use and rely on a lot of propaganda, tell BIG lies, demand things like "show us your papers," create strife between groups of citizens, and collect as much loot from the citizens as possible. (Then they fake their deaths and use their loot to further their dreams of a master race and world domination.)
These devices to track citizens' travels fall into the category of "show us your papers" and will also allow the State to collect more loot (this is how they are going to charge you for using gasoline and related resources), and create feelings of civic "virtue" in those who limit their use of allegedly unrenewable resources like fossil fuels.
Letitia.
Are You at Risk of Forcible Vaccination in California? YES. The California CARE Act: We Are Here from The Government to Help You, So What Could Possibly
It was not all that long ago that a woman who did not conform to other people's social construct of how a woman should be act could be involuntarily committed as "crazy." And the government would her "friends and family" enforce the social norms, often brutally, like the suffragettes who were forcibly "fed" when they went on hunger strikes (and don't get me started on how the Irish freedom fighters were treated).
Well, that can happen again, right here in California, but it won't be crazy women and the Irish. It will be the "anti-vaxxers."
Well, the now-it's-the-unvaxxeds'-turn to be brutalized, by Governor Gruesom's new project, the CARE Act. Ever notice how government-speak makes things sound so "safe and effective"? The CARE Act is more of the same. Sounds wonderful, but it can still be used as a weapon of oppression, a way to let SOMEONE ELSE decide what's best for you, without any consequences to that SOMEONE ELSE if SOMEONE ELSE guesses wrong. There's a bumper-sticker that expresses many feelings about this kind of 'we're here from the government to help you" program: "God, protect me from the people who know what's best for me." For an example, just look how Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" program ended up damaging intact black families and depriving wives and children of husbands and fathers? Great name, terrible consequences -- brought to the black community by people in the government who claimed to know what was best for them. (I suspect that some of those government people actually intended the evil consequences.)
So, now, in 2023, here's how your friendly State government describes Newsom's new program: "The California CARE Act "creates a new pathway to deliver mental health and substance use disorder services to the most severely impaired Californians who too often suffer in homelessness or incarceration without treatment."
Translation: that new "pathway" is the court cases that will let the people who know what's best for you drag you into court and try to get a judge to ORDER you into whatever kind of treatment other people have decided you need. Now, with the desire of many uninformed people to forcibly vaccinate others, just imagine what will happen. It will be like the Florida law that STILL allows the forcible injection of people against their will.
Which DeSantis STILL has done nothing to rid Florida. Instead, he very publicly announced a Grand Jury to investigate the vaccines. Huh? There is no need for a Grand Jury. All he has to do is READ all the information that doctors an scientists have been compiling and listen to the testimony that Senator Ron Johnson has been collecting and just outlaw any more vaccinations.
A Grand Jury is just "grandstanding," playing to the crowd so the evildoers can say, "Trump BAD, he did Warp Speed, DeSantis GOOD, he did Grand Jury" and stay in power whether the Repucrats or Demicans win.
But back to our problem in California, Gruesom Nuisance and his Creepy CARE Act. During 2020 and 2021, I saw how the COVID brainwashing caused one parent or another, or sometimes a grandparent or family friend, to take children into vaccination clinics without parents' permission -- "For the good of the children." Now people will be legally able to do the same thing to adults -- unless enough people send in critical comments.
That's right -- when you refuse to get the next generation of vaccination -- and more are planned for the next 6 years at least (see Gruesome Nuisance's "SMART Plan: https://covid19.ca.gov/smarter/) -- some helpful people will decide you are mentally ill for believing all the disinformation -- but not just if YOU won't get vaccinated. What if you refuse to vaccinate your child, and someone disagrees with that? Well, YOU must be mentally ill!
So a VERY important critique you can make is that, in the absence of a specific and serious mental illness that actually affects cognition, people with a point of view that others disagree with can be rounded up and held against their will -- oh, and since you're too crazy to get vaccinated, they'll have to vaccinate you by force before they can hospitalize you.
Think that can't happen? It already happened to a friend of mine up in Merced. It was before the CARE Act took effect, so the people who didn't like his anti-vaxx stance just used the Health & Safety 5051 method to have him held against his will for 72 hours. And, of course, the hospital couldn't hold him unless it vaccinated him.
The evil California regime, like the evil witch in Snow White, knows how to disguise the lurking deadly consequences with a pretty apple. Want to see the pretty apple? Here it is in the PR: "The CARE Act moves care and support upstream, [huh?] providing the most vulnerable Californians with access to critical behavioral health services, housing and support." Vaccinations "support" your immune system, right?
It all sounds plausible, doesn't it? " CARE recognizes that to serve those with the most complex behavioral health conditions," [translation: "complex" means "not obvious" -- it's just not obvious to the evil authorities WHY you have vaccine "hesitancy" ] we must do the hard work of prioritizing those who need help the most, [translation: people whose mental condition put others at risk must be incarcerated first -- forget the homeless and drug-addicted long-time street residents ] providing a comprehensive CARE plan that honors self-determination to the greatest extent possible, [translation: if your sself-determination includes not being vaccinated, that's an extent too far for the State to honor] and holding ourselves accountable to delivering services [want to bet that services to the unwillingly incarcerated for their own good include vaxxes?]and housing that are key to long term stability and recovery."
Notice that the only "accountability" in this new law is to provide the services, unwanted or not, and that there is no accountability for any unwelcome consequences -- like the side effects of the vaccinations.
Here is the rest of the witch's apple, which now is beginning to look a little wormy: "The CARE Act requires the California Judicial Council to develop a petition form and any other forms necessary for the court process, as well as rules of court to implement the Act’s procedural provisions." [That's the dragged into court part, and I can assure you that you will not enjoy it.]
But there is still something you can do:
"The Judicial Council has posted an invitation to comment on the draft CARE Act Rules and Forms. The comment period runs from December 14, 2022 until January 27, 2023. The Rules and Forms materials for comment and the instructions can be found on the Invitations to Comment page under the “Probate and Mental Health” Topic."
https://www.chhs.ca.gov/care-act/"
PLEASE, PLEASE, share this and ask people to make lots of comments -- and to be aware that now EVERYONE is at risk of forcible vaccination in California. Now it's not just the police 5150'ing people -- it can be your not-yet-awake friends and relatives, co-workers, enemies, anyone.
Letitia Pepper, Attorney in California
PAST SHEEP ISSUES - 2022
Here is a Petition for a Writ of Mandate I just filed for a tenured teacher fired for not complying with Unlawful Vaxx Mandate
I am sharing the attached petition for a writ of mandate and Request for Judicial Notice in case it has ideas you can use. It's for a tenured junior high teacher who was charged with unprofessional conduct for refusing to comply with the school's unlawful vaxx mandate; the legal arguments can probably be applied in other cases, such as when doctors and others are being targeted by their licensing boards.
The materials in this petition are a good reminder that you always need to look at every level of the alleged authorizing authority. Here, a school district's HR department sent out a memo to everyone with a VAXX mandate, which people simply assumed was valid. It wasn't valid, even at the lowest level; HR departments cannot adopt valid school district policies, only the governing board can do that -- and the boards must comply with state law, and the state law says boards cannot adopt policies that conflict with any law.
And, of course, the State statutes must not offend any controlling state and federal constitutional provisions and any controlling federal statutes.
I hope these materials are useful to someone,
Letitia Pepper